I recently attended an excellent IET lecture by Michael Podesta on the pre-history of climate change. What stunned me was a question that came up in the discussion at the end, which was the simple one – “What’s a kiloWattHour?” Despite having used the unit for decades, including a fair amount of time working in the energy sector, I’d never really thought about it. It was evident I wasn’t alone from the audience reaction. For almost everyone, it was just a unit of energy that appeared on our gas and electricity bills.
Many people know what it is in that context. It’s what an electric fire uses in around half an hour. It’s what an old 100W filament bulb uses to light a room for 10 hours (a new LED bulb will light the same room for 100 hours using the same 1 kWh). It’s what your washing machine uses for a low power wash, your dishwasher for an ECO cycle, and what your oven uses to roast a small chicken. Depending on where you live, that kWh of electricity costs between 1p and 50p. But what does it mean? That’s an important question, as almost every discussion about energy usage, net zero and energy security ends up talking about kWhs. So, unless we can relate those kiloWattHours to some sort of physical experience, it’s difficult to engage with the discussions we need to have about energy, which is why they become academic arguments that few relate to. It started me thinking about how to solve that and bring the kWh to life. The first step is go back to where it started and look at James Watt.





